Sweet Orange

Part Three of a three-part series: A Little Story About Our Economy
Part One: The Depression, Keynes, and Manipulating the Money Supply
Part Two: More on Manipulating the Money Supply
Part Three: Solutions?

In yesterday’s post, we saw that standard methods of both the right and left for dealing with an economic crisis have their limits. So what is the answer to our current economic difficulties?

Sticking with the money supply manipulation model and hoping that it will eventually work? Many say: Been there, done that. Didn’t work. These critics also say that the Fed’s attempt to control the money supply leads to economic bubbles and inflation.

Maybe the answer is a return to Keynes, as some say that the current stimulus plan is. However, many criticize this spend-your-way-out-of-the-problem approach as leading to inflation and a huge debt for future generations.

This group that is critical of the Keynes model often calls for tax cuts as the way out. However, criticism of this tactic also exists. For example, the critics of the tax cut model state that George W. Bush cut taxes, but we still had an economic tsunami under his watch.

So what is the answer to our current economic difficulties? As award-winning author and New York Times columnist Tom Friedman suggests, is something entirely new needed?

Let’s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall - when Mother Nature and the market both said: “No more.”—Tom Friedman, “The Inflection Is Near?“

Questions to ponder, posts to write at another time.