<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sweet Orange &#187; Coincident Economic Indicator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/tag/coincident-economic-indicator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com</link>
	<description>Is the Orange County housing juice worth the squeeze?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Employment, a Lagging Economic Indicator: Comparing U.S., California, and Orange County Employment Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/09/08/employment-a-lagging-economic-indicator-comparing-us-california-and-orange-county-employment-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/09/08/employment-a-lagging-economic-indicator-comparing-us-california-and-orange-county-employment-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Walker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coincident Economic Indicator]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[employment numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ken Goldstein]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lagging indicator]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leading Economic Index]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[leading indicator]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recession bottom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/?p=9117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NEW YORK, August 20, 2009&#8230;The Conference Board Leading Economic IndexTM (LEI) for the U.S. increased 0.6 percent in July, following a 0.8 percent gain in June, and a 1.2 percent rise in May.
Says Ken Goldstein, Economist at The Conference Board: &#8220;The indicators suggest that the recession is bottoming out, and that economic activity will likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-9155 alignnone" title="employment-us-1890-20081" src="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/employment-us-1890-20081.jpg" alt="employment-us-1890-20081" width="580" height="304" /></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/economics/bci/sodone.pdf">NEW YORK, August 20, 2009</a>&#8230;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conference_Board">The Conference Board</a> Leading Economic Index<sup>TM</sup> (LEI) for the U.S. increased 0.6 percent in July, following a 0.8 percent gain in June, and a 1.2 percent rise in May.</p>
<p>Says Ken Goldstein, Economist at The Conference Board: &#8220;The indicators suggest that the recession is bottoming out, and that economic activity will likely begin recovering soon. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincident_indicator">Coincident </a>Economic Index was flat in July - the first time it did not register a decline since October 2008. The Leading Economic Index, which has increased for four consecutive months, suggests that the CEI will turn positive soon.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/08/27/what-will-lead-us-to-recovery-the-leading-and-lagging-economic-indicatiors/">recent post</a>, I wrote that Chris Thornberg, principal with Beacon Economics, see improvement in construction, finance, and retail not occurring until sometime after the recovery is underway. In other words, they are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagging_indicator">lagging indicators</a>. The employment numbers are another indicator that Thornberg see  as a lagging indicator in this recovery. Lagging and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_indicator">leading</a> indicators are not the same in every recession. However, improvement in the employment numbers is seen by most economist as a indicator that lags in most recessions.</p>
<p>As I wrote <a href="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/08/04/why-is-us-unemployment-so-high/">previously</a>, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.whitehouse.gov');" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/organization_office/">Peter Orszag</a>, Director of the <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.whitehouse.gov');" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/organization_role/">Office of Management and Budget</a>, agrees that improvement in the employment numbers is a lagging indicator in recessions, including this one. However, he sees the current unemployment numbers as 1.5% higher than is normal for this stage of recession. He sees two reasons for this.</p>
<p>First, the losses in stocks and, therefore, the reduced amount in retirement accounts is making it necessary for many to delay retirement. Previously, pensions, not stock numbers, determined the amount in a retirement account. So the ups and downs of the stock market have a bigger role in this recession. Second, he says the fall in home prices to below the amount owed makes it difficult for many unemployed to relocate to other areas to accept a job offer. This has not been true in other recent downturns.</p>
<p>After a slight downturn in July, the U.S. unemployment number rose in August to 9.7%.  In a few weeks, the California and Orange County numbers will come out. For now, here is a look at the July and June unemployment numbers:</p>
<ul>
<li>U.S&#8211;July: 9.4% (June: 9.5%)</li>
<li>California&#8211;July: 11.9% (June: 11.6%)</li>
<li>Orange County&#8211;July: 9.5% (Jun: 9.3%)</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on why unemployment remains high, see &#8220;<a href="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/08/04/why-is-us-unemployment-so-high/">Why is U.S. Unemployment so High?</a>&#8220;. Also see, <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/bci/pressRelease_output.cfm?cid=1">&#8220;The Conference Board&#8217;s August 2009 Global Business Cycle Indicators</a>&#8221; and <a href="http://headlines.ocregister.com/articles/percent-39078-county-workers.html">Unemployment in O.C., state buck U.S. trend.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Note: For Beacon&#8217;s economic forecast, see <a href="http://www.beaconecon.com/Beaconomics/">Beaconomics</a>.</em></p>
<p>GRAPH COURTESY <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment">WIKIPEDIA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2009/09/08/employment-a-lagging-economic-indicator-comparing-us-california-and-orange-county-employment-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

