Mixed-Use, Urban Development in the Irvine Business Complex: A Few Criticisms
Yesterday, I listed mostly the points in favor of the mixed-use, urban development in the Irvine Business Complex (IBC). Now here is my criticism of the IBC development. The trade off for a more densely built development has often been lower home prices. However, in the boom years of our recent past, the developers could make more money building these high-end high-rises, and understandably this is what they choose to build.
However, even then that wasn’t the primary type of high-density housing that Orange County needed. And today, even with our reduced housing prices, affordability is still a problem in Orange County. Building housing that is more in harmony with the median Orange County income is what is needed. The trade off for higher density should be lower home prices.
I think it would be interesting to take the IBC’s Astoria design tour put on by the American Society of Interior Designers (ASID), and, in the process, support the Orange County Performing Arts Center. But I suggest that future development objectives be tweaked to provide more affordability. And while I am at it, I will put in a word for keeping residential development on a more human scale, which would be four stories or less.
For a look at urban-living in the IBC from a design point of view, see Cindy McNatt’s “Loft-style living,” or watch this YouTube video.
Also, for more information on the current status of the IBC development and some various opinions on the development, see “Mothballed Condo Project in Irvine, CA,” the City of Irvine’s IBC home page, “Irvine planners approve design of large-scale office retail project,” and “Irvine considers 6,000 residential units in urban core.”
GRAPHIC COURTESY THE CITY OF IRVINE
I have written about the evolving development of high- and mid-rise living in the Irvine Business Complex (IBC) and have been meaning to write more about this type of development. A recent post by Erica Chavez at the O.C. Register’s 


