<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sweet Orange &#187; notice of defaults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/tag/notice-of-defaults/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com</link>
	<description>Is the Orange County housing juice worth the squeeze?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Foreclosure Numbers Send Mixed Messages</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/15/california-foreclosure-numbers-send-mixed-messages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/15/california-foreclosure-numbers-send-mixed-messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Walker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DQNews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NOD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[notice of defaults]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trustee sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/?p=14564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to DQNews, the number of Notice of Defaults (NODs) in California was 12.4% higher in the 2009 fourth quarter than it was in the 2008 fourth quarter. The number of fourth quarter trustee sales was also up: 10.6% more foreclosure sales occurred in fourth quarter 2008 than occurred in fourth quarter 2009.
Now here is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.dqnews.com/">DQNews</a>, the number of <a href="http://homebuying.about.com/od/glossaryno/g/011708_NODefaul.htm">Notice of Defaults</a> (NODs) in California was 12.4% higher in the 2009 fourth quarter than it was in the 2008 fourth quarter. The number of fourth quarter <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/trustee-s-sale">trustee sales</a> was also up: 10.6% more foreclosure sales occurred in fourth quarter 2008 than occurred in fourth quarter 2009.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-14642" title="foreclosedhome" src="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/foreclosedhome.jpg" alt="foreclosedhome" width="180" height="135" />Now here is where the numbers get tricky: In spite of the year-over-year increase in the overall numbers, foreclosure sales as a percentage of the housing market declined. In Q4-2009, 40.7% of the resales in California were foreclosure sales. However, in Q4-2008, 54.4% of resales in California were foreclosure sales.</p>
<p>The first set of numbers (the overall number of foreclosure sales) seem to be telling us that foreclosure sales are becoming <em>more</em> prevalent. But the second set of numbers (the number of foreclosure sales as a percentage of the total sales) seem to be telling us that foreclosures are becoming <em>less</em> prevalent.</p>
<p>In addition, more conflicting numbers exist:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dqnews.com/">DQNews</a> states that the number of NODs declined between the third quarter and fourth quarter of 2009. And <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20080828005812&amp;newsLang=en">John Walsh</a>, <a href="http://www.dataquick.com/">DataQuick</a> president, had this to say about the foreclosure market:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Clearly, many lenders and servicers have concluded that the traditional foreclosure process isn&#8217;t necessarily the best way to process market distress, and that losses may be mitigated with so-called short sales or when loan terms are renegotiated with homeowners.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>But many analysts are predicting a sizable increase in defaults when the terms for many outstanding loans adjust upward in the coming year. For example:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Amid falling home prices and a nasty labor market, roughly 1 in every 7 mortgages was either past due or in foreclosure by the end of the third quarter-the highest delinquency rate in the 37-year history of the </em><a href="http://www.mbaa.org/AboutMBA"><em>Mortgage Bankers Association</em></a><em>&#8217;s </em><a href="http://www.mbaa.org/ResearchandForecasts/ProductsandSurveys/NationalDelinquencySurvey.htm"><em>National Delinquency</em></a><em> </em><a href="http://www.mbaa.org/ResearchandForecasts/ProductsandSurveys/NationalDelinquencySurvey.htm"><em>Survey</em></a><em>. Two factors are expected to drive delinquencies even higher next year. First, nearly 1 in 4 homeowners currently owes more on their mortgage than the property is worth, which increases their odds of default. And secondly, the national unemployment rate-which already stands at 10 percent-will peak at about 10.5 percent in the first quarter of 2010, says </em><a href="http://www.ihsglobalinsight.com/ProductsServices/ProductDetail1146.htm#Newport"><em>Patrick Newport</em></a><em>, an economist at </em><a href="http://www.ihsglobalinsight.com/"><em>IHS Global Insight</em></a><em>. Additional job losses mean more borrowers won&#8217;t be able to pay their mortgage bills-&#8221;</em><a href="http://www.usnews.com/money/articles/2009/12/21/10-things-to-know-about-real-estate-in-2010.html"><em>10 Things to Know About Real Estate in 2010</em></a><em>,&#8221; Luke Mullins, </em><a href="http://www.usnews.com/money/articles/2009/12/21/10-things-to-know-about-real-estate-in-2010.html"><em>U.S News &amp; World Report</em></a><em> </em></p></blockquote>
<p>This quote from <em>U.S. News &amp; World Report</em> is referencing the national housing market, but this would apply to Southern California as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/15/california-foreclosure-numbers-send-mixed-messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orange County 2009 Fourth Quarter Foreclosure Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/03/orange-county-2009-fourth-quarter-foreclosure-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/03/orange-county-2009-fourth-quarter-foreclosure-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Walker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Orange County housing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[notice of defaults]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trustee sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/?p=14398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Here are the most recent Orange County foreclosure numbers from DQNews:
Notice of Defaults (NODs)&#8211;This is the first step in the foreclosure process; however, this does not necessarily end in the home being taken back by the lender.
Fourth Quarter 2009  Year-Over-Year Numbers:

 2009&#8211;5,555
2008&#8211;4,481
This is a 24.0% year-over-year increase. However, the quarter-to-quarter  number of NODs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-2781 alignright" title="auction-hand" src="http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/auction-hand.jpg" alt="auction-hand" width="213" height="105" /></p>
<p>Here are the most recent Orange County foreclosure numbers from <a href="http://www.dqnews.com/Articles/2010/News/California/CA-Foreclosures/RRFor100127.aspx">DQNews</a>:</p>
<p><strong>Notice of Defaults (NODs)&#8211;</strong>This is the first step in the foreclosure process; however, this does not necessarily end in the home being taken back by the lender.</p>
<p><em>Fourth Quarter </em><em>2009</em><em> </em><em> Year-Over-Year Numbers:</em></p>
<ul>
<li> 2009&#8211;5,555</li>
<li>2008&#8211;4,481</li>
<li>This is a 24.0% year-over-year increase. However, the quarter-to-quarter  number of NODs deceased.</li>
</ul>
<p><em> Third Quarter </em><em>2009 </em><em>Year-Over-Year Numbers:</em></p>
<ul>
<li> 2009&#8211;7,436</li>
<li>2008&#8212;5,692</li>
<li>This is a 30.6% year-over-year increase.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Trustee Sales Recorded</strong>&#8211;This is the last step in the foreclosure process. The home is sold to a new owner at a trustee auction or taken back by the lender in this stage of the foreclosure process.</p>
<p><em>Fourth Quarter </em><em> </em><em>2009 </em><em>Year-Over-Year Numbers:</em></p>
<ul>
<li>2009&#8211;2,235</li>
<li>2008&#8211;2,088</li>
<li>This is a 7.0% year-over-year increase. In addition, the quarter-to-quarter number of trustee sales is approximately the same.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Third Quarter </em><em>2009 </em><em>Year-Over-Year Numbers:</em></p>
<ul>
<li>2009&#8211;2,238</li>
<li> 2008&#8212;3,997</li>
<li>This is a 44.0% year-over-year decrease.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sweetorangehousing.com/2010/02/03/orange-county-2009-fourth-quarter-foreclosure-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

